Damage Specification Standards 2026

DSS-Co
Coating Anomalies

Draft v1.0

Table of Contents

Co.01 Sputtered Low‑E & Multilayer Films

  • Co.01.01 Abrasion sheen shift / rub marks
  • Co.01.02 Color non‑uniformity / patchiness
  • Co.01.03 Pinholes/islands (localized loss)
  • Co.01.04 Chemical attack spots (cleaner/acid/alkali)

Co.02 Pyrolytic (Hard‑Coat) Low‑E

  • Co.02.01 Roller pickup/line ghosting (pyrolytic line)
  • Co.02.02 Surface rub/scuff (appearance change)
  • Co.02.03 Local coating discontinuity

Co.03 AR/IR/Other Functional Coats

  • Co.03.01 AR bloom/scuff (anti‑reflective)
  • Co.03.02 Hard‑coat micro‑mottle

Co.04 Spandrel & Back‑Paint Systems

  • Co.04.01 Mottle/cloudiness (seen from exterior)
  • Co.04.02 Pinholes/holidays
  • Co.04.03 Back‑paint adhesion loss islands

Co.05 Ceramic Frit

  • Co.05.01 Frit smears/offset
  • Co.05.02 Pinholes/voids
  • Co.05.03 Frit over‑spray/ghost at edge

Co.01

Sputtered Low‑E & Multilayer Films

DSS-Co.01.01

Abrasion Sheen Shift / Rub Marks (sputtered low-E & multilayer films)

DSS-Co.01.01
Abrasion Sheen Shift / Rub Marks (sputtered low-E & multilayer films)
(Coating anomaly on the worked surface β€” face-side condition; acceptance constrained by VIS Β§6.2 β€œCoatings”)

Definition (Reference)

A localized change in sheen, luster, or color cast on a sputtered low-E or other multilayer functional coating, typically caused by contact, friction, or over-working at the exposed coated face (#1 or #4, as applicable). Presents as a rubbed patch, streak, or directional band without discrete chip flanks. On coated worked surfaces, appearance anomalies introduced by restoration are not permitted at acceptance (see VIS Β§6; coating appearance context per ASTM C1376).

Typical Presentation (Informative)

  • Matte or glossy β€œrub area” that reads as sheen shift vs. surrounding field; strongest under raking light and oblique sweep.
  • Linear or arcuate streaks aligned with prior motion paths (pads, squeegees, cloths); no bright chip flanks as with scratches.
  • May co-exist with micro-mottle or faint color non-uniformity within the patch. The cue persists after Non-Invasive Reveal if it is a true coating-appearance change.

Field Identification Cues (Normative)

Surface-catch class (MSRT):

  • Expect SC-0 (none) when the anomaly is purely optical in the coating stack. Perform one light, non-marring pass only; prefer a polymer stylus on suspected coated faces or rely on visual cues to avoid coating disturbance. Do not abrade or β€œprobe.” MSRT supports classification only, not acceptance.

Reveal / lighting / geometry:

  • Perform Non-Invasive Reveal (clean & dry; no blades/chemicals) before evaluation. Inspect at 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal incidence + oblique sweep (~60°–120Β°) under raking light, per VIS.

Location / access:

  • Confirm the observation is on the exposed coated face (not between panes). Record pane ID and surface numbering; note β€œfunctional coating present on worked surface? (Y/N/Unknown)” on Forms:

Classification Mapping (to VIS-DA) (Normative)

  • Typical CAT band (appearance-based):
  • CAT-1 if non-tactile sheen shift with SC-0 and no edge morphology.
  • CAT-2 if subtle micro-texture yields SC-1 (slight).
  • CAT-3 if pronounced, patchy modeled micro-texture visible at standard distance, still without chip flanks.
    (Use VIS visibility convention and MSRT outcome; assign CAT by observable cues, not by cause.)
  • Acceptance split (critical): Even if classified CAT-1…CAT-3, coating anomalies on the worked surface are not permitted at acceptance under VIS Β§6.2 (β€œCoatings”); acceptance remains appearance-based at required distances/angles.

Indicative Relief / Depth (Informative)

  • For true coating rubs, the glass surface relief is typically nil at the MSRT scale (SC-0). Numeric depth in ΞΌm is not determinative for coating-appearance anomalies; VIS acceptance is appearance-only.

Differentiation & False Positives (Informative)

  • vs. Mechanical scratches (M.01): Scratches show chip flanks/micro-chipping and SC-2 along a line; coating rubs lack chip flanks and are area-based sheen shifts (often SC-0).
  • vs. Face films/residues (R-family): Residues change with Non-Invasive Reveal; a true rub persists after reveal.
  • vs. Between-pane haze/volatiles (A.01.01): IGU internal cues show fixed parallax and are CAT-5 by location; coating rubs are on the worked face.

Evidence Package (Documentation Requirements) (Normative)

  1. Photo set (VIS): 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal + oblique, include raking; add a macro frame showing boundaryless sheen shift (no transition edge/chip flanks). Note reveal status and lighting/time.
  2. MSRT result: Record SC class (expect SC-0); one pass, non-marring; on coated faces prefer polymer stylus or visual-only.
  3. Forms: Pane ID; surface numbering; worked surface Y/N; functional coating present on worked surface? (Y/N/Unknown); geometry checklist; photos attached.

Mis-ID Pitfalls (Informative)

Attempting to β€œblend out” a coating rub by further contact can enlarge the anomaly and create a visible worked region/transition edge, which VIS disallows at acceptance (CAT-0…CAT-4). Keep classification appearance-only; do not introduce new coating changes.

Reporting Language (Template)

  • Co.01.01 Abrasion Sheen Shift / Rub Marks (sputtered low-E) β€” Localized coating sheen shift/streaks at #__ verified after Non-Invasive Reveal; MSRT = SC-0 (no tactile relief); no chip flanks. Classified CAT-1…CAT-3 by visibility and texture per VIS. Acceptance note: Coating anomalies on the worked surface are not permitted at VIS Β§6.2; document at 12/36/72 in (normal + oblique + raking), record surface numbering and coating presence, and retain images with macro detail.

DSS-Co.01.02

Color Non-Uniformity / Patchiness (sputtered low-E & multilayer films)

DSS-Co.01.02
Color Non-Uniformity / Patchiness (sputtered low-E & multilayer films)
(Coating anomaly on the worked surface β€” face-side condition; acceptance constrained by VIS Β§6 β€œCoatings”)

Definition (Reference)

A localized change in color cast, tone, or optical density within a sputtered low-E or other multilayer functional coating on an exposed face (#1 or #4, as applicable). Presents as patchy zones, clouds, or bands without chip-flank fracture morphology. Under VIS, such coating anomalies are β€œcoating anomalies (visual)” and are treated as appearance cues on the worked surfaceβ€”not between-pane/system features.

Typical Presentation (Informative)

  • Pane-local patches or clouds of slightly different hue/brightness; strongest under raking light and oblique sweep; may align with prior contact paths (pads/cloths).
  • No discrete chip flanks or cratered texture (unlike mechanical/thermal damage).
  • Persists after Non-Invasive Reveal (clean & dry); if removal occurs, the cue was a face film/residue, not a coating anomaly.

Field Identification Cues (Normative)

Surface-catch class (MSRT):

  • Expect SC-0 (none) if the cue is a pure coating-appearance change. Perform one light, non-marring pass only; prefer a polymer stylus on suspected coated facesβ€”or rely on visual/location cues to avoid disturbing the coating. MSRT supports classification only, not acceptance.

Reveal / lighting / geometry:

  • Complete Non-Invasive Reveal (clean & dry; no blades/chemicals) before evaluation. Inspect at 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal incidence + oblique sweep (~60°–120Β°) with raking light, per VIS.

Location / access:

  • Confirm the observation is on the exposed coated face (not in an IGU cavity or laminate). Record pane ID and surface numbering on forms; note β€œfunctional coating present on worked surface? (Y/N/Unknown)”.

Classification Mapping (to VIS-DA) (Normative)

  • Typical CAT band (appearance-based):
  • CAT-1 β€” non-tactile color patchiness; SC-0; no edge morphology at acceptance geometry.
  • CAT-2 β€” subtle micro-texture within the patch yielding SC-1 (slight).
  • CAT-3 β€” pronounced, patchy modeled micro-texture detectable at standard distance, still without chip flanks.
    (Assign CAT by observable cues using VIS visibility convention + MSRT outcome.)
  • Acceptance split (critical): Even if classified CAT-1…CAT-3, coating anomalies on the worked surface are not permitted at acceptance under VIS coatings guidance (see project-spec phrasing referencing VIS Β§6.2.e).

Indicative Relief / Depth (Informative)

  • For true coating patchiness, glass-face relief is typically nil at MSRT (SC-0). Numeric ΞΌm depth is not determinative for coating-appearance anomalies; VIS acceptance is appearance-only at the required distances/angles.

Differentiation & False Positives (Informative)

  • vs. Mechanical scratches (M.01): Scratches show chip flanks/micro-chipping and SC-2 along a line; coating color patchiness lacks flanks and is area-based.
  • vs. Face films/residues (R-family): Residues change with Non-Invasive Reveal; a true coating patch persists after reveal.
  • vs. IGU/internal haze (A.01.01) or cavity fines (A.01.03): Internal cues exhibit fixed parallax and are CAT-5 by location; coating anomalies are on the worked face.

Evidence Package (Documentation Requirements) (Normative)

  1. Photo set (VIS): 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal + oblique, include raking; add a macro frame showing boundaryless patchiness (no chip flanks/transition edge). Note reveal status and lighting/time.
  2. MSRT result: Record SC class (expect SC-0); one pass, non-marring; on coated faces prefer polymer stylus or visual-only.
  3. Forms: Pane ID; surface numbering; worked surface Y/N; functional coating present on worked surface? (Y/N/Unknown); geometry checklist; photos attached.

Mis-ID Pitfalls (Informative)

Trying to β€œblend out” a color patch can enlarge the anomaly and create a worked region/transition edge, which VIS disallows at acceptance for CAT-0…CAT-4. Confirm reveal, SC class, and location before any action.

Reporting Language (Template)

  • Co.01.02 Color Non-Uniformity / Patchiness (sputtered stack) β€” Localized color/brightness variation at #__ verified after Non-Invasive Reveal; MSRT = SC-0; no chip flanks. Classified CAT-1…CAT-3 by visibility/texture per VIS. Acceptance note: Coating anomalies on the worked surface are not permitted (see project spec language referencing VIS Β§6.2.e). Document at 12/36/72 in (normal + oblique + raking), record surface numbering and coating presence, and attach photo set.

DSS-Co.01.03

Pinholes / Islands (localized coating loss; sputtered low-E & multilayer films)

DSS-Co.01.03
Pinholes / Islands (localized coating loss; sputtered low-E & multilayer films)
(Coating anomaly on the worked surface or within cavity; acceptance constrained by VIS Β§6 β€œCoatings”)

Definition (Reference)

Discrete clear points (β€œpinholes”) or small bare-glass islands within a sputtered low-E / multilayer functional coating. On exposed coated faces (#1 or #4, as applicable) these present as local loss of optical density (often brighter/clearer) without chip-flank fracture morphology. On cavity faces (#2/#3), they are between-pane and thus not addressable in-place; classification is then governed by location/condition. VIS treats coating appearance on worked surfaces as an appearance cue and references ASTM C1376 for coating-appearance context.

Typical Presentation (Informative)

  • Isolated clear dots or minute islands that read as lighter/clearer pixels against the coated field; sometimes occur in small clusters.
  • No change after Non-Invasive Reveal (clean & dry); persists through 12/36/72-in views and is strongest under raking light / oblique sweep.
  • May be margin-biased (near handling/wipe paths) but lack a worked ring/edge unless additional face-side alteration exists.

Field Identification Cues (Normative)

Surface-catch class (MSRT):

  • Expect SC-0 (none) for pure coating loss/absence; coating stacks are sub-ΞΌm and do not produce tactile relief at MSRT scale. Perform one light, non-marring pass only; on coated faces prefer a polymer stylus or rely on visual cues to avoid disturbing coatings. MSRT supports classification only, not acceptance.

Reveal / lighting / geometry:

  • Complete Non-Invasive Reveal before evaluation. Inspect at 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal incidence + oblique sweep (~60°–120Β°) with raking light, per VIS.

Location / access:

  • Confirm surface numbering and whether the low-E is on #1/#4 (exposed) or #2/#3 (cavity). Cavity-face cues are between panes; use fixed parallax to verify internal location. Record β€œfunctional coating present on worked surface? (Y/N/Unknown)” on Forms:

Classification Mapping (to VIS-DA) (Normative)

  • If on exposed coated face (#1/#4)
    • CAT-1 β€” non-tactile, isolated pinholes with SC-0, not perceptible at standard/wide-field when clean.
    • CAT-2 β€” faint modeled micro-texture around a pinhole yielding SC-1.
    • CAT-3 β€” noticeable modeled micro-texture/halo visible at standard view, still without chip flanks.
      (Assign CAT by visibility convention + MSRT outcome; use appearance cues only.)
  • If on cavity face (#2/#3) or otherwise inaccessible: CAT-5 β€” out of in-place scope by location; document and refer per project protocol (fabricator/manufacturer/warranty).
  • Acceptance split (critical): Even where classified CAT-1…CAT-3, coating anomalies on the worked surface are not permitted at acceptance under VIS Β§6.2.e (appearance-only criteria).

Indicative Relief / Depth (Informative)

  • MSRT relief: SC-0 expected (sub-ΞΌm coating thickness; tactile relief not detected). Numeric ΞΌm depth is not determinative for coating-appearance anomalies; acceptance remains appearance-based at required distances/angles.

Differentiation & False Positives (Informative)

  • vs. Face films/overspray (R-family): Films change with Non-Invasive Reveal; true pinholes persist.
  • vs. Mechanical scratches (M.01): Scratches show chip flanks/micro-chipping and SC-2 along a line; pinholes are discrete points, SC-0.
  • vs. IGU internal haze/volatiles (A.01.01) or cavity fines (A.01.03): Internal cues show fixed parallax and are CAT-5 by location.
  • vs. Spandrel system mottle (Co.04.01): Spandrel mottle is pane-scale without a local perimeter; pinholes/adhesion-loss islands are localized defects.

Evidence Package (Documentation Requirements) (Normative)

  1. Photo set (VIS): 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal + oblique, include raking; add macro frames showing discrete point(s) without chip flanks or a worked ring. Note reveal status and lighting/time.
    MSRT result: Record SC class (expect SC-0); one pass, non-marring; on coated faces prefer polymer stylus or visual-only.
  2. Forms: Pane ID; surface numbering; worked surface Y/N; functional coating present on worked surface? (Y/N/Unknown); geometry checklist; photos attached.

Mis-ID Pitfalls (Informative)

Attempting to β€œblend out” pinholes by further contact can enlarge the anomaly and create a worked region/transition edge, which VIS disallows at acceptance (CAT-0…CAT-4). Confirm location, reveal status, and SC class before any action.

Reporting Language (Template)

  • Co.01.03 Pinholes / Islands (localized coating loss, sputtered stack) β€” Discrete clear point(s)/islands at #__ verified after Non-Invasive Reveal; MSRT = SC-0; no chip flanks. If on #1/#4, classify CAT-1…CAT-3 by visibility/texture; acceptance note: coating anomalies on worked surfaces not permitted (VIS Β§6.2.e). If on #2/#3, CAT-5 by location (between panes); document and refer. Photo set captured at 12/36/72 in (normal + oblique + raking); surface numbering and coating presence recorded.

DSS-Co.01.04

Chemical Attack Spots (cleaner/acid/alkali on sputtered stacks)

DSS-Co.01.04
Chemical Attack Spots (cleaner/acid/alkali on sputtered stacks)
(Coating anomaly on the worked surface or on a cavity face; acceptance constrained by VIS Β§6 β€œCoatings”)

Definition (Reference)

Localized appearance changes (spots, rings, blooms) on a sputtered low-E / multilayer functional coating caused by chemical interaction (e.g., acidic brick wash, alkaline cleaners, aggressive solvents). On exposed coated faces (#1 or #4, as applicable), these present as sheen/colour/density shifts or matte β€œburns” without chip-flank fracture morphology. On cavity faces (#2/#3), similar signatures are between panes and therefore not addressable in place; classification is driven by location/condition. Under VIS, coating appearance on worked surfaces is treated as an appearance cue; acceptance for coated faces is handled explicitly in the coatings note of Β§6 (coating anomalies on the worked surface are not permitted at acceptance).

Typical Presentation (Informative)

  • Discrete spots or halos with altered sheen/colour; strongest in raking light/oblique sweep; may exhibit a faint ring at the perimeter.
  • Patchy mottle from cleaner pooling, drips, or wipe paths; often correlates with application patterning.
  • Persists after Non-Invasive Reveal (clean & dry); if removal occurs, the cue was a face film/residue (R-family), not a coating change.

Field Identification Cues (Normative)

Surface-catch class (MSRT):

  • Expect SC-0 (none) for purely optical coating changes; SC-1 (slight) is possible if subtle micro-texture is present within the spot. Perform one light, non-marring pass only; on coated faces prefer a polymer stylus or rely on visual cues to avoid coating disturbance. MSRT supports classification only, not acceptance.

Reveal / lighting / geometry:

  • Complete Non-Invasive Reveal (clean & dry; no blades/chemicals) before evaluation. Inspect at 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal incidence + oblique sweep (~60°–120Β°) with raking light, per VIS.

Location / access:

  • Confirm the observation is on the exposed coated face (not in an IGU cavity). Record pane ID and surface numbering (#1–#4; mark laminate-internal if applicable) on forms; note β€œfunctional coating present on worked surface? (Y/N/Unknown)”. Use fixed parallax to identify between-pane look-alikes (CAT-5).

Classification Mapping (to VIS-DA) (Normative)

If on exposed coated face (#1/#4):

  • CAT-1 β€” non-tactile spot/halo with SC-0; no edge morphology at acceptance geometry.
  • CAT-2 β€” faint micro-texture within the spot yielding SC-1 (slight).
  • CAT-3 β€” pronounced modeled micro-texture/patch detectable at standard distance, still without chip flanks.
    (Assign CAT by visibility convention + MSRT outcome; cause is informative only.)

If on cavity face (#2/#3) or otherwise inaccessible:

  • CAT-5 β€” out of in-place scope by location; document and refer per project protocol (fabricator/manufacturer/warranty).
  • Acceptance split (critical): Even if classified CAT-1…CAT-3, coating anomalies on the worked surface are not permitted at acceptance under the VIS coatings note (Β§6); treat acceptance as appearance-only at required distances/angles and do not introduce new coating changes.

Indicative Relief / Depth (Informative)

  • For true chemical attack spots on coatings, glass-face relief is typically nil at MSRT (SC-0; occasionally SC-1 if micro-texture is present). Numeric ΞΌm depth is not determinative for coating-appearance anomalies; acceptance remains appearance-based.

Differentiation & False Positives (Informative)

  • vs. Face films/residues (R-family): Residues change with Non-Invasive Reveal; a true coating attack persists after reveal.
  • vs. Mechanical scratches (M.01): Scratches show chip flanks/micro-chipping and SC-2 along a line; chemical spots are area-based, boundaryless or haloed, and generally SC-0/SC-1.
  • vs. IGU internal haze/volatiles (A.01.01): Internal cues show fixed parallax and map to CAT-5 by location.
  • vs. Spandrel/back-paint mottle (Co.04.01): Spandrel mottle is pane-scale system appearance; chemical spots on sputtered stacks are localized coating changes on the worked face.

Evidence Package (Documentation Requirements) (Normative)

  1. Photo set (VIS): 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal + oblique, include raking; add macro frames showing spot/halo without chip flanks or a worked transition edge. Note reveal status and lighting/time.
  2. MSRT result: Record SC class (expect SC-0; SC-1 if micro-texture). One pass, non-marring; on coated faces prefer polymer stylus or visual-only.
  3. Forms: Pane ID; surface numbering; worked surface Y/N; functional coating present on worked surface? (Y/N/Unknown); geometry checklist; photos attached.

Mis-ID Pitfalls (Informative)

Attempting to β€œblend out” a coating spot can enlarge the anomaly and create a worked region/transition edge, which VIS disallows at acceptance (CAT-0…CAT-4). Confirm reveal, SC class, and location before any action.

Reporting Language (Template)

  • Co.01.04 Chemical Attack Spots (sputtered stack) β€” Localized spot/halo at #__ verified after Non-Invasive Reveal; MSRT = SC-0/SC-1 (no chip flanks). If on #1/#4, classify CAT-1…CAT-3 by visibility/texture; acceptance note: coating anomalies on the worked surface are not permitted (VIS coatings note). If on #2/#3, CAT-5 by location (between panes); document and refer. Photo set at 12/36/72 in (normal + oblique + raking); surface numbering and coating presence recorded.

Co.02

Pyrolytic (Hard‑Coat) Low‑E

DSS-Co.02.01

Roller Pickup / Line Ghosting (Pyrolytic Line)

DSS-Co.02.01
Roller Pickup / Line Ghosting (Pyrolytic Line)
(Pyrolytic [hard-coat] low-E anomaly β€” transport/handling imprint during high-temperature deposition or subsequent hot processing; quasi-parallel sheen-shift bands at roller pitch; generally planar, film-level optical variation; typically SC-0, occasionally SC-1 at lightly textured pickup)

Classification & Scope (Normative)

Roller pickup/line ghosting (pyrolytic line) is an appearance change confined to pyrolytic (hard-coat) low-E or comparable high-temperature functional coatings. It presents as quasi-parallel, longitudinal bands (machine/transport direction) at spacings consistent with support/transport rollers, with subtle sheen or color shift (ghosting). The phenomenon is planar within the coating and usually non-tactile. Classification is appearance-only per VIS (method-agnostic). Inspect after Non-Invasive Reveal under VIS lighting/geometry; record surface numbering and worked-surface status.

Face identification is critical. Pyrolytic hard-coats are commonly placed at #2 in IGUs (or #1/#4 where design requires). Confirm coated face before classification.

Typical Presentation (Informative)

  • Multiple, parallel, low-contrast bands running consistently in one direction (line direction); band width and pitch repeat pane-to-pane within a lot.
  • Bands read as sheen shift / slight color cast in reflection; contrast rises under oblique sweep and raking.
  • May co-present with very faint roller β€œkiss” arcs at edges or entry/exit zones.

Field Identification Cues (Normative)

Surface-catch class (MSRT)

  • SC-0 (planar optical variation within coating; no surface relief).
  • SC-1 rare, where lightly textured pickup or fine particulate imprint provides very shallow relief.
  • Perform one light, non-marring pass on a small revealed test patch. Use a polymer stylus only on suspected coated faces. MSRT supports classification only; do not abrade the coating.

Visual signature

  • Quasi-parallel stripe set; fixed pitch and consistent direction across the pane; no chip-flank sparkle, no discrete pits.
  • Planar behavior: bands persist uniformly when moving viewpoint along the band; no localized β€œworked region” edge.
  • Often lot-repetitive: adjacent lites from same supply may show identical spacing/orientation.

Viewing / lighting

  • Evaluate clean & dry at 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal and oblique sweep (~60°–120Β°); raking amplifies sheen shift; use broad specular reflection to read band pitch. Record distances/angles in-frame.

Location / access

  • Record pane ID and surface numbering (#1–#4; laminate-internal). If the anomaly is on #2/#3 within an IGU, it is inaccessible in place β†’ CAT-5 by location for in-place restoration scope (classification remains Co.02.01).

Mechanism cue (context)

  • Pyrolytic deposition or hot handling history; consistent line direction with roller transport; lot repetition; absence of field activities that cause scoring or chemical halos.

Severity & CAT Mapping (Normative)

Assign CAT by visibility at acceptance geometry and MSRT. Depth values are indicativeβ€”field measurement not required.

  • CAT-1 (Benign / non-relief): Faint banding legible mainly at oblique/raking; SC-0; minimal impact at standard view. Indicative relief: 0–10 ΞΌm (film-level optical only).
  • CAT-2 (Light): Discernible bands at standard distance in certain lighting; SC-0 (or rare SC-1 if lightly textured pickup). Indicative relief: ~10–40 ΞΌm (apparent optical).
  • CAT-3 (Moderate): Pane-noticeable band set at standard distance across significant area; SC-0/SC-1; clearly affects uniform appearance. Indicative relief: ~40–120 ΞΌm (apparent optical).
  • Reclassify when: If chip-flank sparkle or tactile grooves appear β†’ M.01 Linear scoring; if uniform granular frost in masked regions β†’ V.01.01 abrasive blast; if runs/cream swirls exist β†’ V.02 chemical etch; if peppered fused nodules present β†’ Th.01.02 hot particle.
  • CAT-5 (by condition/location): Anomaly on #2/#3 (between panes) or coating-side to be worked where compliant presentation cannot be achieved β†’ CAT-5.

CAT is appearance-based; acceptance is separate under VIS-A at 12/36/72 in. Do not abrade coated faces to β€œforce” a response.

Differentiation & Mis-ID Pitfalls (Informative)

  • vs. M.01/M.02 mechanical: Mechanical defects show directional grooves/swirl with SC-1/SC-2 and chip-flank sparkle; Co.02.01 is planar sheen shift, typically SC-0.
  • vs. Co.01 sputtered low-E patchiness: Sputtered films often show color non-uniformity without roller-pitch periodicity; pyrolytic roller ghosting shows regular spacing aligned to transport direction.
  • vs. Ch.03 mineral staining/etch: Mineral systems show ringed halos/runs and can be SC-1/SC-2; roller ghosting lacks wetting geometry and remains lot-repetitive.
  • vs. E.01 atmospheric film: Atmospheric films are random or flow-mapped and lift on reveal; roller ghosting persists and is coating-intrinsic.

Evidence Package *(Documentation Requirements) (Normative)

  1. Photo set (VIS): 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal + oblique; raking macros across band transitions; overview frames capturing parallelism and pitch. Record distance/angle in-frame.
  2. Face ID + MSRT. Confirm coated surface via project documentation or controlled reflection tests; MSRT (polymer stylus only) on a small reveal patch: record SC-class (SC-0 typical).
  3. Lot/replication check. Where possible, document adjacent lites for repeated spacing/orientation (supports coating-intrinsic attribution).
  4. Forms: Pane ID; product family & surface numbering; worked surface Y/N; functional coating present on worked surface? (Y/N/Unknown); reveal status; lighting/time; geometry checklist; photos attached.
  5. Acceptance split: Post-restoration acceptance per VIS-A Β§6; classification β‰  acceptance. Coated-face appearance rules apply per VIS Β§6.2.e when the worked surface is the functional coating.

Reporting Language (Template)

  • Co.02.01 Roller Pickup / Line Ghosting (Pyrolytic) β€” Quasi-parallel sheen-shift bands at consistent roller pitch on surface #___ (pyrolytic hard-coat confirmed); MSRT (polymer): SC-0 [SC-1 localized if applicable]; visible at [12/36/72 in] under VIS geometry. Morphology: planar coating variation, no chip-flank sparkle, no pits/runs. Classification: CAT-[1/2/3] by visibility; reclassify per notes if mechanical/chemical indicators present; CAT-5 if between-pane or coating-side constraints preclude in-place work. Forms + photo set attached; acceptance per VIS-A Β§6.

DSS-Co.02.02

Surface Rub / Scuff (Pyrolytic Hard-Coat Appearance Change)

DSS-Co.02.02
Surface Rub / Scuff (Pyrolytic Hard-Coat Appearance Change)
(Pyrolytic [hard-coat] low-E anomaly β€” contact/rub during handling/cleaning producing localized sheen shift or faint mottle on the coated face; generally planar optical change in the coating; typically SC-0, occasionally SC-1 where micro-imprint exists; confirm coated face before attribution)

Classification & Scope (Normative)

Surface rub / scuff (pyrolytic) is an appearance change confined to pyrolytic (hard-coat) functional coatings where contact, wiping, or pad/roller kiss produces localized sheen shift or faint mottle without discrete linear chip flanks or pits. The effect is planar within the coating and is usually non-tactile. Classification is appearance-only per VIS (method-agnostic). Inspect after Non-Invasive Reveal under VIS lighting/geometry; record surface numbering and worked-surface status.

Face identification is critical. Pyrolytic hard-coats are commonly at #2 in IGUs (or #1/#4 by design). Confirm coated face prior to classification.

Typical Presentation (Informative)

  • Subtle, patchy sheen shift or low-contrast rub panel; boundaries are soft/feathered, sometimes following wipe arcs or contact zones (e.g., handling pads).
  • No strong directionality; reads best in oblique/sweep and broad specular reflection.
  • May co-present with very faint parallel β€œkiss” traces in transport areas but without periodic roller pitch (cf. Co.02.01).

Field Identification Cues (Normative)

Surface-catch class (MSRT)

  • SC-0 typical (planar optical change).
  • SC-1 localized only if a very light micro-imprint/texture is present (e.g., pad weave ghost).
  • Perform one light, non-marring pass on a small revealed test patch; polymer stylus only on suspected coated faces. MSRT supports classification only; do not abrade the coating.

Visual signature

  • Sheen or color cast change within a soft-edged patch; no chip-flank sparkle, no discrete grooves, no pits/fused nodules.
  • Typically lot-isolated (handling/maintenance event) rather than lot-wide repetition.

Viewing / lighting

  • Evaluate clean & dry at 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal and oblique sweep (~60°–120Β°); use broad raking to make sheen shifts apparent. Record distances/angles in-frame.

Location / access

  • Record pane ID and surface numbering (#1–#4; laminate-internal). If on #2/#3 (IGU interior), it is inaccessible in place β†’ CAT-5 by location (classification remains Co.02.02).

Mechanism cue (context)

  • Handling/cleaning contact on coated face; improper wipes, abrasive cloths, or pad contact; absence of field activities that produce scoring (M.01) or chemical swirls (V.02/Ch.01).

Severity & CAT Mapping (Normative)

Assign CAT by visibility at acceptance geometry and MSRT.

  • CAT-1 (Benign / non-relief): Faint rub panel visible mainly at oblique/raking; SC-0. Indicative relief: 0–10 ΞΌm (optical only).
  • CAT-2 (Light): Discernible sheen shift at standard distance in certain lighting; SC-0 (or SC-1 localized if micro-imprint present). Indicative relief: ~10–40 ΞΌm (apparent optical).
  • CAT-3 (Moderate): Pane-noticeable patch/panel at standard distance affecting uniformity; SC-0/SC-1. Indicative relief: ~40–120 ΞΌm (apparent optical).
  • Reclassify when: Parallel periodic bands at fixed pitch β†’ Co.02.01 roller ghosting; linear chip-flank grooves β†’ M.01 scoring; modeled chemical micro-texture with runs/meniscus β†’ V.02/Ch.01; peppered fused nodules β†’ Th.01.02.
  • CAT-5 (by condition/location): Between-pane/inaccessible or coating-side constraints preclude compliant presentation β†’ CAT-5.

CAT is appearance-based; acceptance is separate under VIS-A at 12/36/72 in. Do not abrade coated faces to β€œforce” a response.

Differentiation & Mis-ID Pitfalls (Informative)

  • vs. Co.02.01 roller ghosting: Roller ghosting shows parallel bands with regular pitch; rub/scuff is localized with soft boundaries and no fixed pitch.
  • vs. M.02 abrasion swirls: Abrasion swirls show directional/swirl patterning and often SC-1 across paths; Co.02.02 lacks coherent swirl geometry and remains largely SC-0.
  • vs. Ch.03 mineral film/etch: Mineral systems show ring/run geometry and can be SC-1/SC-2; Co.02.02 is planar and non-ringed.
  • vs. Sputtered low-E patchiness (Co.01.02): Sputtered non-uniformity may be lot-wide color variations without wipe history; Co.02.02 associates with contact/wipe context on a hard-coat face.

Evidence Package *(Documentation Requirements) (Normative)

  1. Photo set (VIS): 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal + oblique; raking macros across rub panel boundary; overview frames to show localization. Record distance/angle in-frame.
  2. Face ID + MSRT. Confirm coated surface; MSRT (polymer stylus only) on revealed patch: record SC-class (SC-0 typical; SC-1 localized if present).
  3. Context notes. Handling/maintenance history; cleaning media used; adjacency to contact points (pads, rails, suction cups).
  4. Forms: Pane ID; product family & surface numbering; worked surface Y/N; functional coating present on worked surface? (Y/N/Unknown); reveal status; lighting/time; geometry checklist; photos attached.
  5. Acceptance split: Post-restoration acceptance per VIS-A Β§6; classification β‰  acceptance. Coated-face appearance rules apply per VIS Β§6.2.e when the worked surface is the functional coating.

Reporting Language (Template)

  • Co.02.02 Surface Rub / Scuff (Pyrolytic) β€” Localized sheen-shift/mottle on surface #___ (pyrolytic hard-coat confirmed); MSRT (polymer): SC-0 [SC-1 localized if micro-imprint]; visible at [12/36/72 in] under VIS geometry. Morphology: planar coating appearance change, soft boundaries, no chip-flank grooves, no pits. Classification: CAT-[1/2/3] by visibility; reclassify per notes if roller-pitch, mechanical scoring, or chemical indicators are present; CAT-5 if between-pane or coating-side constraints preclude in-place work. Forms + photo set attached; acceptance per VIS-A Β§6.

DSS-Co.02.03

Local Coating Discontinuity (Pyrolytic Hard-Coat)

DSS-Co.02.03
Local Coating Discontinuity (Pyrolytic Hard-Coat)
(Pyrolytic [hard-coat] low-E anomaly β€” localized thin/void spot, streak, or island within the deposited film; planar optical discontinuity often with sharp or feathered boundary; typically SC-0, occasionally SC-1 at minute imprint; confirm coated face before attribution)

Classification & Scope (Normative)

Local coating discontinuity (pyrolytic) is an appearance change confined to pyrolytic (hard-coat) functional coatings where the deposited film exhibits a localized reduction in thickness, skip/void, or density change. It presents as a spot, small island, short streak, or patch with distinct sheen/color shift relative to surrounding coated areas. The phenomenon is planar within the coating and is generally non-tactile. Classification is appearance-only per VIS (method-agnostic). Inspect after Non-Invasive Reveal under VIS lighting/geometry; record surface numbering and worked-surface status.

Face identification is critical. Pyrolytic hard-coats commonly reside at #2 in IGUs (or #1/#4 by design). Confirm coated face before classification.

Typical Presentation (Informative)

  • Discrete spot/island (few mm to ~50 mm), short streak, or small patch with contrast shift (brighter/duller, warmer/cooler) vs. adjacent coating.
  • Boundary can be sharp (abrupt film change) or soft/feathered (density gradient).
  • May repeat at similar position across multiple lites in a lot (process-linked), or appear isolated (contact/handling during hot pass).

Field Identification Cues (Normative)

Surface-catch class (MSRT)

  • SC-0 typical (planar optical change within coating).
  • SC-1 localized only if a minute micro-imprint exists (e.g., particulate contact imprint).
  • Perform one light, non-marring pass on a small revealed test patch; polymer stylus only on suspected coated faces. MSRT supports classification only; do not abrade the coating.

Visual signature

  • Planar, non-grooved patch; no chip-flank sparkle, no pits/fused nodules.
  • Color/shear change becomes more apparent in oblique sweep; under broad specular, the discontinuity outlines as the reflection β€œflashes.”
  • If intra-lot repetition exists at consistent coordinates, favors intrinsic deposition/transport origin.

Viewing / lighting

  • Evaluate clean & dry at 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal and oblique sweep (~60°–120Β°); raking to read boundary; broad specular to gauge color/shear change. Record distances/angles in-frame.

Location / access

  • Record pane ID and surface numbering (#1–#4; laminate-internal). If on #2/#3 (IGU interior), it is inaccessible in place β†’ CAT-5 by location (classification remains Co.02.03).

Mechanism cue (context)

  • Hot deposition skip/variation, transient contamination on support, or contact imprint during hot transport; absence of field indicators (no runs/cream swirls, no scoring).

Severity & CAT Mapping (Normative)

Assign CAT by visibility at acceptance geometry and MSRT.

  • CAT-1 (Benign / non-relief): Small faint spot/streak legible mainly at oblique/raking; SC-0. Indicative relief: 0–10 ΞΌm (optical only).
  • CAT-2 (Light): Discernible discontinuity at standard distance in certain lighting; SC-0 (or SC-1 localized if micro-imprint). Indicative relief: ~10–40 ΞΌm (apparent optical).
  • CAT-3 (Moderate): Pane-noticeable patch at standard distance affecting uniformity over >0.5% of view area; SC-0/SC-1. Indicative relief: ~40–120 ΞΌm (apparent optical).
  • Reclassify when: Parallel periodic bands β†’ Co.02.01 Roller pickup; localized sheen shift tied to wipe arcs β†’ Co.02.02 Rub/Scuff; linear grooves with chip flanks β†’ M.01 Scoring; ring/run/halo chemistry β†’ Ch.01/Ch.03; fused metallic peppering β†’ Th.01.02.
  • CAT-5 (by condition/location): Between-pane/inaccessible or coating-side constraints preclude compliant presentation β†’ CAT-5.

CAT is appearance-based; acceptance is separate under VIS-A at 12/36/72 in. Do not abrade coated faces to β€œforce” a response.

Differentiation & Mis-ID Pitfalls (Informative)

  • vs. Sputtered low-E pinholes/islands (Co.01.03): Sputtered defects often show fine pinholes or color islands without hot-transport context and may be lot-wide but non-periodic; pyrolytic discontinuity often links to hot handling or specific line position.
  • vs. Mineral/chemical spots (Ch family): Chemical spots show ring/rim, runs, or micro-texture (SC-1/2); Co.02.03 is planar, SC-0, without wetting geometry.
  • vs. Mechanical pad trails (M.02): Abrasion trails show directional texture and SC-1 over a path; Co.02.03 is localized and non-directional at micro-scale.
  • vs. Spandrel/back-paint anomalies (Co.04): Spandrel issues present on back-painted surfaces with opacity differences; Co.02.03 is on a functional hard-coat.

Evidence Package *(Documentation Requirements) (Normative)

  1. Photo set (VIS): 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal + oblique; raking macros showing boundary; overview frames documenting size and position. Record distance/angle in-frame.
  2. Face ID + MSRT. Confirm coated surface; MSRT (polymer stylus only) on revealed patch records SC-class (SC-0 typical; SC-1 localized if present).
  3. Lot/replication check. Inspect adjacent lites for coordinate/shape repetition to support intrinsic origin.
  4. Forms: Pane ID; product family & surface numbering; worked surface Y/N; functional coating present on worked surface? (Y/N/Unknown); reveal status; lighting/time; geometry checklist; photos attached.
  5. Acceptance split: Post-restoration acceptance per VIS-A Β§6; classification β‰  acceptance. Coated-face appearance rules apply per VIS Β§6.2.e when the worked surface is the functional coating.

Reporting Language (Template)

  • Co.02.03 Local Coating Discontinuity (Pyrolytic) β€” Discrete spot/streak with planar sheen/color shift on surface #___ (pyrolytic hard-coat confirmed); MSRT (polymer): SC-0 [SC-1 localized if micro-imprint]; visible at [12/36/72 in] under VIS geometry. Morphology: localized coating density/continuity change, no chip-flank grooves, no pits/runs. Classification: CAT-[1/2/3] by visibility; reclassify per notes if roller-pitch, rub/scuff, mechanical scoring, chemical, or spandrel indicators dominate; CAT-5 if between-pane or coating-side constraints preclude in-place work. Forms + photo set attached; acceptance per VIS-A Β§6.

Co.03

AR/IR/Other Functional Coats

DSS-Co.03.01

AR Bloom / Scuff (Anti-Reflective & Other Optical Films)

DSS-Co.03.01
AR Bloom / Scuff (Anti-Reflective & Other Optical Films)
(Thin-film optical stack anomaly β€” localized sheen/color shift or β€œbloom” on anti-reflective (AR) / IR-control / glare-reduction films; typically planar, non-tactile; SC-0, occasionally SC-1 where micro-imprint exists; confirm coated face before attribution)

Classification & Scope (Normative)

AR bloom/scuff is an appearance change confined to thin-film optical coatings (anti-reflective, IR, glare-reduction). It manifests as localized increases in reflectivity (β€œbloom”), haze, or color cast shift relative to adjacent areas. Effects are planar within the coating and usually non-tactile. Classification is appearance-only per VIS (method-agnostic). Inspect after Non-Invasive Reveal under VIS lighting/geometry; record surface numbering and worked-surface status.

Face identification is critical. Many AR/optical films are specified on #2 (or #1/#4 depending on design). Confirm the coated face prior to classification.

Typical Presentation (Informative)

  • Localized β€œbloom” where reflections appear stronger/brighter than surrounding AR areas; sometimes a cool/warm color drift.
  • Soft-edged scuff panels or contact-shaped patches; may correlate with wipe arcs, suction cup contact, or handling pads.
  • Under oblique sweep the patch flashes earlier/later than adjacent AR field.

Field Identification Cues (Normative)

Surface-catch class (MSRT)

  • SC-0 typical (planar optical change).
  • SC-1 localized only if a minute texture imprint exists (pad weave/foreign dust imprint).
  • Perform one light, non-marring pass on a small revealed test patch; polymer stylus only on suspected coated faces. MSRT supports classification only; do not abrade the coating.

Visual signature

  • Planar sheen increase (AR locally less effective) or haze/mottle; no chip-flank sparkle, no discrete grooves, no pits/fused nodules.
  • Not periodic (vs. roller pitch); typically isolated to contact/wipe areas.

Viewing / lighting

  • Evaluate clean & dry at 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal and oblique sweep (~60°–120Β°); use broad specular to compare reflectivity inside vs. outside patch. Record distances/angles in-frame.

Location / access

  • Record pane ID and surface numbering (#1–#4; laminate-internal). If on #2/#3 (IGU interior), it is inaccessible in place β†’ CAT-5 by location (classification remains Co.03.01).

Mechanism cue (context)

  • Contact/wipe on AR face, improper cleaners, deposited films that altered interference response, or minor densification changes from contact/pressure during handling.

Severity & CAT Mapping (Normative)

Assign CAT by visibility at acceptance geometry and MSRT.

  • CAT-1 (Benign / non-relief): Faint bloom/scuff visible mainly at oblique/raking; SC-0. Indicative relief: 0–10 ΞΌm (optical only).
  • CAT-2 (Light): Discernible reflectivity/color shift at standard distance in certain lighting; SC-0 (or SC-1 localized if micro-imprint). Indicative relief: ~10–40 ΞΌm (apparent optical).
  • CAT-3 (Moderate): Pane-noticeable patch/panel at standard distance affecting uniform appearance; SC-0/SC-1. Indicative relief: ~40–120 ΞΌm (apparent optical).
  • Reclassify when: Parallel periodic bands β†’ Co.02.01 Roller pickup; wipe-arc linked on pyrolytic β†’ Co.02.02 Rub/Scuff (pyrolytic); linear grooves with chip flanks β†’ M.01 Scoring; rings/runs β†’ Ch.01/Ch.03 chemistry; fused peppering β†’ Th.01.02 hot particle.
  • CAT-5 (by condition/location): Between-pane/inaccessible or coating-side constraints preclude compliant presentation β†’ CAT-5.

CAT is appearance-based; acceptance is separate under VIS-A at 12/36/72 in. Do not abrade coated faces to β€œforce” a response.

Differentiation & Mis-ID Pitfalls (Informative)

  • vs. Pyrolytic rub/scuff (Co.02.02): Pyrolytic hard-coats are hot-applied and may present different hue/reflectivity behavior; AR stacks show interference-sensitive bloom that changes more strongly with angle.
  • vs. Sputtered low-E patchiness (Co.01.02): Low-E color non-uniformity may be lot-scale and non-contact-specific; AR bloom/scuff is localized with contact/wipe context.
  • vs. Mineral/chemical films (Ch family): Chemical films exhibit rings/runs and can yield SC-1/2; AR bloom is planar, ringless, usually SC-0 after reveal.
  • vs. Abrasion fields (M.02): Abrasion shows directional texture and consistent SC-1; AR bloom lacks coherent texturing and remains optical.

Evidence Package *(Documentation Requirements) (Normative)

  1. Photo set (VIS): 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal + oblique; raking macros across patch boundary; broad specular comparison frames (inside vs. outside patch). Record distance/angle in-frame.
  2. Face ID + MSRT. Confirm AR/optical coated face; MSRT (polymer stylus only) on a revealed patch to record SC-class (SC-0 typical; SC-1 localized if present).
  3. Context notes. Handling/maintenance history, cleaners/media used, adjacent contact points (pads/cups/rails).
  4. Forms: Pane ID; product family & surface numbering; worked surface Y/N; functional coating present on worked surface? (Y/N/Unknown); reveal status; lighting/time; geometry checklist; photos attached.
  5. Acceptance split: Post-restoration acceptance per VIS-A Β§6; classification β‰  acceptance. Coated-face appearance rules apply per VIS Β§6.2.e when the worked surface is the optical coating.

Reporting Language (Template)

  • Co.03.01 AR Bloom / Scuff β€” Localized increase in reflectivity / color-cast shift on surface #___ (AR/optical coated face confirmed); MSRT (polymer): SC-0 [SC-1 localized if micro-imprint]; visible at [12/36/72 in] under VIS geometry. Morphology: planar thin-film optical variation, soft boundaries, no chip-flank grooves, no pits. Classification: CAT-[1/2/3] by visibility; reclassify per notes if roller-pitch, mechanical scoring, or chemical indicators are present; CAT-5 if between-pane or coating-side constraints preclude in-place work. Forms + photo set attached; acceptance per VIS-A Β§6.

DSS-Co.03.02

Hard-Coat Micro-Mottle (Other Functional Films)

DSS-Co.03.02
Hard-Coat Micro-Mottle (Other Functional Films)

(Thin/β€œhard” functional films other than low-Eβ€”e.g., AR hybrids, IR-control, solar-control, anti-glareβ€”showing fine planar mottle/texture in the coating; non-directional, patchy reflectance or color micro-variation; typically SC-0, rarely SC-1 where minute imprint exists; confirm coated face before attribution)

Classification & Scope (Normative)

Hard-coat micro-mottle is an appearance change confined to functional hard films (non-pyrolytic low-E alternatives, AR/IR hybrids, solar/anti-glare coatings) presenting as fine, non-directional mottleβ€”a subtle patchwork of reflectance or color within the coated area. The effect is planar within the coating and usually non-tactile. Classification is appearance-only per VIS (method-agnostic). Inspect after Non-Invasive Reveal under VIS lighting/geometry; record surface numbering and worked-surface status.

Face identification is critical. Many functional films are specified on #2 (or #1/#4 by design). Confirm the coated face prior to classification.

Typical Presentation (Informative)

  • Fine, cloud-like micro-mottle or orange-peel-like optical texture that becomes apparent in oblique sweep or broad specular reflection.
  • No coherent directionality (not a rub trail or swirl); no periodic pitch (not roller ghosting).
  • Can present lot-wide subtlety (global cast) with localized zones of higher contrast.

Field Identification Cues (Normative)

Surface-catch class (MSRT)

  • SC-0 typical (planar optical variation).
  • SC-1 localized only if a minute contact imprint (pad weave/foreign dust) coincides with mottled zone.
  • Perform one light, non-marring pass on a small revealed test patch; polymer stylus only on suspected coated faces. MSRT supports classification only; do not abrade the coating.

Visual signature

  • Non-directional, fine-scale mottle in reflectance or color; boundaries often soft/feathered.
  • No chip-flank sparkle, no discrete grooves, no pits/fused nodules.
  • Angle-dependent β€œflash”—mottle appears/disappears as the observer sweeps.

Viewing / lighting

  • Evaluate clean & dry at 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal and oblique sweep (~60°–120Β°); use broad specular to compare inside vs. outside the mottled zone. Record distances/angles in-frame.

Location / access

  • Record pane ID and surface numbering (#1–#4; laminate-internal). If on #2/#3 (IGU interior), it is inaccessible in place β†’ CAT-5 by location (classification remains Co.03.02).

Mechanism cue (context)

  • Coating process micro-nonuniformity, post-coat handling/stacking pressure optics, or localized over-cleaning with incompatible media altering the thin-film interference response.

Severity & CAT Mapping (Normative)

Assign CAT by visibility at acceptance geometry and MSRT.

  • CAT-1 (Benign / non-relief): Very faint mottle legible mainly at oblique/raking; SC-0. Indicative relief: 0–10 ΞΌm (optical only).
  • CAT-2 (Light): Discernible micro-mottle at standard distance in certain lighting; SC-0 (or SC-1 localized if micro-imprint). Indicative relief: ~10–40 ΞΌm (apparent optical).
  • CAT-3 (Moderate): Pane-noticeable mottled panel at standard distance, affecting uniformity; SC-0/SC-1. Indicative relief: ~40–120 ΞΌm (apparent optical).
  • Reclassify when: Parallel periodic bands β†’ Co.02.01 Roller pickup; wipe-arc-linked β†’ Co.02.02 Rub/Scuff (pyrolytic) or Co.03.01 AR bloom; linear grooves with chip flanks β†’ M.01 Scoring; rings/runs β†’ Ch.01/Ch.03 chemistry; peppered fusing β†’ Th.01.02 Hot particle.
  • CAT-5 (by condition/location): Between-pane/inaccessible or coating-side constraints preclude compliant presentation β†’ CAT-5.

CAT is appearance-based; acceptance is separate under VIS-A at 12/36/72 in. Do not abrade coated faces to β€œforce” a response.

Differentiation & Mis-ID Pitfalls (Informative)

  • vs. AR bloom/scuff (Co.03.01): AR bloom often shows distinct reflectivity increase with contact context; Co.03.02 is a fine, non-directional mottle that may be process-intrinsic.
  • vs. Pyrolytic rub/scuff (Co.02.02): Pyrolytic rubs are localized wipe/contact panels; Co.03.02 lacks wipe geometry and can appear lot-distributed.
  • vs. Mineral/chemical films (Ch family): Chemistry shows rings/runs and may yield SC-1/2; Co.03.02 is planar, ringless, typically SC-0.
  • vs. Abrasion fields (M.02): Abrasion presents directional texture with consistent SC-1 along paths; Co.03.02 lacks coherent directionality.

Evidence Package *(Documentation Requirements) (Normative)

  1. Photo set (VIS): 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal + oblique; raking macros across mottle boundary; broad specular comparison (inside vs. outside zone). Record distance/angle in-frame.
  2. Face ID + MSRT. Confirm functional coated face; MSRT (polymer stylus only) on a revealed patch to record SC-class (SC-0 typical; SC-1 localized if present).
  3. Context notes. Lot repetition (intrinsic) vs. isolated (handling/cleaning); cleaners/media used; storage/stacking history.
  4. Forms: Pane ID; product family & surface numbering; worked surface Y/N; functional coating present on worked surface? (Y/N/Unknown); reveal status; lighting/time; geometry checklist; photos attached.
  5. Acceptance split: Post-restoration acceptance per VIS-A Β§6; classification β‰  acceptance. Coated-face appearance rules apply per VIS Β§6.2.e when the worked surface is the functional coating.

Reporting Language (Template)

  • Co.03.02 Hard-Coat Micro-Mottle β€” Fine, non-directional mottle/optical texture on surface #___ (functional coated face confirmed); MSRT (polymer): SC-0 [SC-1 localized if micro-imprint]; visible at [12/36/72 in] under VIS geometry. Morphology: planar thin-film nonuniformity, soft boundaries, no chip-flank grooves, no pits. Classification: CAT-[1/2/3] by visibility; reclassify per notes if roller-pitch, contact rub, mechanical scoring, chemical, or hot-particle indicators are present; CAT-5 if between-pane or coating-side constraints preclude in-place work. Forms + photo set attached; acceptance per VIS-A Β§6.

Co.04

Spandrel & Back‑Paint Systems

DSS-Co.04.01

Mottle / Cloudiness (Spandrel & Back-Paint Systems)

DSS-Co.04.01
Mottle / Cloudiness (Spandrel & Back-Paint Systems)
(Back-paint/ceramic-coated opacity system anomaly β€” non-uniform opacity or β€œclouding” visible in reflection/transmission (as designed); planar within paint/frit layer on non-viewable side; typically SC-0 from glass side; confirm system build and coated face before attribution)

Classification & Scope (Normative)

Mottle/cloudiness (spandrel/back-paint) is an appearance change confined to opaque or semi-opaque coatings applied to the non-viewable side of glass (e.g., spandrel back-paint, ceramic frit behind glass, back-coated vision bands). It presents as patchy opacity/density variation, clouding, or tone shifts that are planar within the back-coating and typically non-tactile from the glass side. Classification is appearance-only per VIS (method-agnostic). Inspect after Non-Invasive Reveal on the viewable surface under VIS lighting/geometry; record surface numbering and worked-surface status.

System identification is critical. Confirm coating type (ceramic frit vs. organic back-paint), application location (usually on #2 or #4 surface for spandrel assemblies), and vision vs. non-vision intent.

Typical Presentation (Informative)

  • Soft, cloud-like mottle across back-paint fields, most obvious in oblique reflections or with behind-glass illumination differences.
  • Opacity windows or tone bands where film thickness varies; lap or roller marks possible in long runs.
  • Lot or panel repetition suggests process origin; isolated patches may reflect touch-ups or substrate contamination before paint.

Field Identification Cues (Normative)

Surface-catch class (MSRT)

  • From the viewing (glass) side, SC-0 (planar change behind the glass).
  • Do not perform MSRT on the back-coating face in situ. MSRT supports classification only on the viewing surface.

Visual signature

  • Planar opacity/reflectance variation without surface grooves or pits on the viewing side.
  • No chip-flank sparkle, no fused nodules on the glass surface.
  • Edge read-through: variations often track application edges, mask lines, or support rails behind glass.

Viewing / lighting

  • Evaluate clean & dry at 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal and oblique sweep (~60°–120Β°); use broad specular and, where permitted, back-lighting (ambient building lighting) to accentuate opacity differences. Record distances/angles in-frame.

Location / access

  • Record pane ID and surface numbering (#1–#4; laminate-internal); spandrel/back-paint typically resides on non-exposed faces (e.g., #2 behind air space or #4). If the anomaly is behind the lite or within an IGU, it is inaccessible in place β†’ CAT-5 by location for in-place work scope (classification remains Co.04.01).

Mechanism cue (context)

  • Application non-uniformity (wet film thickness, solvent flash), sub-surface contamination before paint, cure/oven variation, or touch-up blends. Absence of field indicators tied to mechanical or chemical attack on the viewing face.

Severity & CAT Mapping (Normative)

Assign CAT by visibility at acceptance geometry (from the viewing side). Depth values below are apparent optical, not substrate relief.

  • CAT-1 (Benign / non-relief): Faint cloudiness legible mainly at oblique/raking; SC-0 at the viewing surface. Indicative relief: 0–10 ΞΌm (optical only).
  • CAT-2 (Light): Discernible mottle at standard distance in specific lighting; SC-0 viewing surface. Indicative relief: ~10–40 ΞΌm (apparent optical).
  • CAT-3 (Moderate): Pane-noticeable non-uniformity at standard distance affecting perceived uniformity across a field; SC-0 viewing surface. Indicative relief: ~40–120 ΞΌm (apparent optical).
  • Reclassify when: If features show ring/run geometry on the viewing face β†’ consider Ch family; if linear chip-flank grooves are present β†’ M.01 scoring; if peppered fused nodules are visible β†’ Th.01 hot particle (on the viewing face).
  • CAT-5 (by condition/location): Between-pane or back-paint face inaccessible; or coating-side constraints preclude any in-place correction β†’ CAT-5.

CAT is appearance-based; acceptance is separate under VIS-A at 12/36/72 in. Spandrel/back-paint anomalies are typically system/producer governed; in-place restoration is out of scope when the defect is on a non-exposed face.

Differentiation & Mis-ID Pitfalls (Informative)

  • vs. Vision-lite coating anomalies (Co.02/Co.03): Spandrel/back-paint presents on non-vision/opaque zones and reads as opacity density change, not AR/low-E interference shifts.
  • vs. Chemical films (Ch): Chemistry on the viewing face shows rings/runs/etch and may yield SC-1/2; Co.04.01 remains planar SC-0 on the viewing surface.
  • vs. Abrasion fields (M.02): Abrasion has directional texture and SC-1; spandrel mottle lacks surface relief.
  • vs. Substrate defects (P.02/P.03): Seeds/striae modulate transmission but do not create opaque paint mottle boundaries.

Evidence Package *(Documentation Requirements) (Normative)

  1. Photo set (VIS): 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal + oblique; broad specular and ambient back-lit frames to show density differences; raking macros confirming smooth viewing surface. Record distance/angle in-frame.
  2. Face/System ID. Confirm spandrel/back-paint face and system build (shop drawings, submittals).
  3. MSRT (viewing surface only). SC-0 expected; record result to distinguish from surface abrasion or chemical attack.
  4. Lot/replication check. Document adjacent units for pattern repetition to support producer-intrinsic origin.
  5. Forms: Pane ID; product family & surface numbering; worked surface Y/N; functional/back-paint coating on worked surface? (Y/N/Unknown); reveal status; lighting/time; geometry checklist; photos attached.
  6. Acceptance split: Post-restoration acceptance per VIS-A Β§6 (viewing geometry); classification β‰  acceptance. Non-exposed coating faces are typically outside in-place restoration scope.

Reporting Language (Template)

  • Co.04.01 Mottle / Cloudiness (Spandrel/Back-Paint) β€” Planar opacity non-uniformity/clouding behind glass on surface #___ (back-paint/frit system confirmed); MSRT (viewing face): SC-0; visible at [12/36/72 in] under VIS geometry and [oblique/back-lit]. Morphology: cloud-like density variation, no chip-flank grooves, no surface pits. Classification: CAT-[1/2/3] by visibility; CAT-5 if between-pane/back-paint face inaccessible; reclassify only if viewing-face mechanical/chemical indicators are present. Forms + photo set attached; acceptance per VIS-A Β§6.

DSS-Co.04.02

Pinholes / Holidays (Spandrel & Back-Paint Systems)

DSS-Co.04.02
Pinholes / Holidays (Spandrel & Back-Paint Systems)
(Back-paint/ceramic-frit opacity system anomaly β€” discrete clear points/voids or ultra-thin spots within the opaque layer; reads through glass from viewing side; planar from glass surface; SC-0 at viewing face; confirm system build and coated face before attribution)

Classification & Scope (Normative)

Pinholes/holidays (spandrel/back-paint) are discrete, point-like voids or ultra-thin spots in an opaque or semi-opaque coating applied to the non-viewable side of the glass (e.g., spandrel back-paint, ceramic frit). From the viewing face they present as tiny bright/clear dots (transmission) or high-reflectance specks (reflection). The defect is planar behind the glass and non-tactile at the viewing surface. Classification is appearance-only per VIS (method-agnostic). Inspect after Non-Invasive Reveal at the viewing surface under VIS lighting/geometry; record surface numbering and worked-surface status.

System identification is critical. Confirm coating type (organic back-paint vs. ceramic frit), location (commonly #2 or #4), and vision vs. non-vision intent.

Typical Presentation (Informative)

  • Isolated or clustered clear points (0.1–2 mm typical), sometimes constellated along dust trails or application edges.
  • Under back-light: points appear bright relative to the field; under specular reflection: points sparkle.
  • Clusters may align with application direction, screen edges, masking lines, or particulate contamination sites.

Field Identification Cues (Normative)

Surface-catch class (MSRT)

  • At the viewing (glass) surface: SC-0 (planar defect behind glass).
  • Do not perform MSRT on the back-coating face in situ. MSRT supports classification only on the viewing surface.

Visual signature

  • Discrete point voids with sharp boundaries; no chip-flank sparkle, no grooves, no pits on the viewing face.
  • Size distribution is narrow within a cluster; repeatability across units suggests process origin (e.g., screen pinhole, dust seeds, solvent pop).

Viewing / lighting

  • Evaluate clean & dry at 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal and oblique sweep (~60°–120Β°). Use back-lit frames (ambient interior lighting) and broad specular to make points legible. Record distances/angles in-frame.

Location / access

  • Record pane ID and surface numbering (#1–#4; laminate-internal). If the anomaly resides on #2/#3 (IGU interior) or otherwise non-exposed back-coat, it is inaccessible in place β†’ CAT-5 by location (classification remains Co.04.02).

Mechanism cue (context)

  • Particulate contamination at paint/frit application (masking dust, oil), screen printing voids, solvent pop, insufficient wet film or edge draw-down, post-cure adhesion loss at point seeds.

Severity & CAT Mapping (Normative)

Assign CAT by visibility at acceptance geometry and count/density of pinholes. Depth values are apparent optical, not substrate relief.

  • CAT-1 (Benign / non-relief): Few, very fine pinholes legible mainly in oblique/back-lit conditions; SC-0 viewing surface. Indicative optical relief: 0–10 ΞΌm (apparent).
  • CAT-2 (Light): Scattered pinholes visible at standard distance under common lighting; SC-0; aesthetic but limited area. Indicative optical: ~10–40 ΞΌm.
  • CAT-3 (Moderate): Clusters/bands of pinholes affecting perceived uniformity across >0.5% area or along critical sightlines; SC-0. Indicative optical: ~40–120 ΞΌm.
  • Reclassify when: If points correspond to front-face pits or fused nodules β†’ Th.01 hot particle; if ring/halo chemistry appears on viewing face β†’ Ch family; if linear grooves exist β†’ M.01.
  • CAT-5 (by condition/location): Between-pane/back-paint face inaccessible, or system constraints preclude in-place correction β†’ CAT-5.

CAT is appearance-based; acceptance is separate under VIS-A at 12/36/72 in. Spandrel/back-paint pinholes are commonly producer/system governed and outside in-place restoration scope when on non-exposed faces.

Differentiation & Mis-ID Pitfalls (Informative)

  • vs. Mineral peppering (Ch.03): Mineral peppering shows ring/flow context and may be SC-1/2; Co.04.02 pinholes are planar behind glass and SC-0 at the viewing surface.
  • vs. Hot particle embed (Th.01.02): Hot particle shows fused hemispheres/craters on the exposed face; Co.04.02 points are clear windows through an opaque back-coat.
  • vs. AR/low-E pinholes (Co.01.03): Functional low-E pinholes occur on vision coatings and affect interference color; spandrel pinholes occur in opaque fields and read as bright dot windows.
  • vs. Dust on glass: Loose dust moves/lifts with reveal; pinholes persist at fixed coordinates.

Evidence Package *(Documentation Requirements) (Normative)

  1. Photo set (VIS): 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal + oblique; back-lit frames to make clear points evident; raking macros verifying smooth viewing surface. Record distance/angle in-frame.
  2. Face/System ID. Confirm spandrel/back-paint face and system build (submittals/shop drawings).
  3. MSRT (viewing surface only). Record SC-0 to distinguish from front-face mechanical/chemical attack.
  4. Lot/replication check. Survey adjacent lites for coordinate repetition (supports producer-intrinsic origin).
  5. Forms: Pane ID; product family & surface numbering; worked surface Y/N; functional/back-paint coating on worked surface? (Y/N/Unknown); reveal status; lighting/time; geometry checklist; photos attached.
  6. Acceptance split: Post-restoration acceptance per VIS-A Β§6; classification β‰  acceptance. Non-exposed coating faces are typically outside in-place restoration scope.

Reporting Language (Template)

  • Co.04.02 Pinholes / Holidays (Spandrel/Back-Paint) β€” Discrete clear/bright points through opaque back-coat on surface #___ (system build confirmed); MSRT (viewing face): SC-0; visible at [12/36/72 in] under VIS geometry and [back-lit/specular]. Morphology: point-voids, no chip-flank grooves, no surface pits on viewing face. Classification: CAT-[1/2/3] by visibility/density; CAT-5 if between-pane/back-paint face inaccessible; reclassify only if front-face mechanical/chemical indicators are present. Forms + photo set attached; acceptance per VIS-A Β§6.

DSS-Co.04.03

Back-Paint Adhesion Loss Islands

DSS-Co.04.03
Back-Paint Adhesion Loss Islands
(Back-paint/ceramic-frit opacity system anomaly β€” localized loss of adhesion or cohesive failure within the back-coating forming β€œislands,” blisters, or lift at edges; reads through glass from viewing side; typically SC-0 at viewing face; confirm system build and coated face before attribution)

Classification & Scope (Normative)

Back-paint adhesion loss islands are localized detachments (adhesive or cohesive) within an opaque/semi-opaque back-coating on the non-viewable side of glass (e.g., spandrel paint, back-coated vision bands, ceramic frit overcoats). From the viewing face they present as duller/darker or brighter windows, contour-edged islands, or blisters; in advanced states they may flake, crescent at edges, or show voids at corners, fastener points, or rails. The defect is behind the glass and non-tactile from the viewing side. Classification is appearance-only per VIS (method-agnostic). Inspect after Non-Invasive Reveal at the viewing surface under VIS lighting/geometry; record surface numbering and worked-surface status.

System identification is critical. Confirm coating type (organic back-paint vs. ceramic frit), location (commonly #2 or #4), and vision vs. non-vision intent.

Typical Presentation (Informative)

  • Irregular β€œislands” or lobed patches with sharp/feathered boundaries; may show edge crescenting where paint lifts from glass.
  • Blister domes (sub-millimeter to several millimeters) that change contrast with oblique sweep or light grazing.
  • Edge-origin is common: along gasket/rail lines, fastener penetrations, mask/paint stops, splice joints, or thermal bridges.
  • In severe cases, flaked paint voids expose clear glass through the spandrel field.

Field Identification Cues (Normative)

Surface-catch class (MSRT)

  • At the viewing (glass) surface: SC-0 (planar defect behind the glass).
  • Do not perform MSRT on the back-coating face in situ. MSRT supports classification only on the viewing surface.

Visual signature

  • Contour-bounded islands/blisters; no chip-flank sparkle, no grooves, no pits on the viewing face.
  • Parallax confirms behind-glass location; islands maintain position relative to reflections as the observer moves.
  • Propagation cues: islands often grow inward from edges/corners or along hardware contact zones.

Viewing / lighting

  • Evaluate clean & dry at 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal and oblique sweep (~60°–120Β°); raking enhances island outlines and blister domes; ambient back-lighting highlights clear exposures/voids. Record distances/angles in-frame.

Location / access

  • Record pane ID and surface numbering (#1–#4; laminate-internal). If the anomaly resides on #2/#3 (IGU interior) or otherwise non-exposed back-coat, it is inaccessible in place β†’ CAT-5 by location (classification remains Co.04.03).

Mechanism cue (context)

  • Adhesion failure due to surface prep contamination, incompatible cleaners/solvents from behind, plasticizer/chemical migration from adjacent materials, UV/thermal cycling, moisture ingress, or mechanical shear at supports. Ceramic frit generally has excellent adhesion; similar β€œisland” presentations on frit often implicate over-coats or interposed layers, not the frit itself.

Severity & CAT Mapping (Normative)

Assign CAT by visibility at acceptance geometry and areal extent/progression (from the viewing side). Depth values below are apparent optical, not substrate relief.

  • CAT-1 (Benign / non-relief): Few, small islands/blisters (<5 mm), legible mainly at oblique/raking; SC-0 viewing surface; no edge propagation.
  • CAT-2 (Light): Scattered islands visible at standard distance; cumulative affected area ≀0.5% of the field; SC-0 viewing surface.
  • CAT-3 (Moderate): Clusters/bands or edge-propagating islands affecting perceived uniformity >0.5% or along critical sightlines; localized clear voids may be present; SC-0 viewing surface.
  • Escalation / reclassify: If front-face chemical rings/runs coexist β†’ also classify Ch family; if front-face grooves/pits present β†’ M/Th families.
  • CAT-5 (by condition/location): Between-pane/back-coat face inaccessible, or system constraints preclude in-place correction β†’ CAT-5.

CAT is appearance-based; acceptance is separate under VIS-A at 12/36/72 in. Back-paint adhesion failures are commonly producer/system issues and outside in-place restoration scope when on non-exposed faces.

Differentiation & Mis-ID Pitfalls (Informative)

  • vs. Pinholes/holidays (Co.04.02): Pinholes are point-voids with sharp, tiny dots; adhesion-loss islands are larger lobed patches or blisters with contoured boundaries.
  • vs. Spandrel mottle (Co.04.01): Mottle is cloud-like density variation without discrete boundaries/blister domes.
  • vs. Front-face chemistry (Ch): Chemical attack shows rings/runs/etch at the viewing surface and can yield SC-1/2; Co.04.03 remains SC-0 on the viewing face.
  • vs. Delamination in laminates (A.02.06): Laminate delamination occurs within plies/interlayer, often with edge whitening/bubbles mid-thickness; back-paint islands are on the rear coating, not within laminate plies.

Evidence Package *(Documentation Requirements) (Normative)

  1. Photo set (VIS): 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal + oblique; raking macros across island edges/blisters; back-lit frames for clear voids; document edge origin if present. Record distance/angle in-frame.
  2. Face/System ID. Confirm back-paint/frit face and system build (submittals/shop drawings). Note adjacent gaskets/rails/adhesives that may contribute.
  3. MSRT (viewing surface only). Record SC-0 to distinguish from front-face mechanical/chemical attack.
  4. Lot/replication check. Survey adjacent units for pattern repetition or edge-progression to support producer/system origin.
  5. Forms: Pane ID; product family & surface numbering; worked surface Y/N; functional/back-paint coating on worked surface? (Y/N/Unknown); reveal status; lighting/time; geometry checklist; photos attached.
  6. Acceptance split: Post-restoration acceptance per VIS-A Β§6; classification β‰  acceptance. Non-exposed coating faces are typically outside in-place restoration scope.

Reporting Language (Template)

  • Co.04.03 Back-Paint Adhesion Loss Islands β€” Contour-bounded islands/blisters behind glass on surface #___ (back-paint/frit system confirmed); MSRT (viewing face): SC-0; visible at [12/36/72 in] under VIS geometry and [oblique/back-lit]. Morphology: localized adhesion/cohesive failure, possible edge-origin propagation, no chip-flank grooves/pits on viewing face. Classification: CAT-[1/2/3] by visibility/extent; CAT-5 if between-pane/back-coat face inaccessible; reclassify only if viewing-face mechanical/chemical indicators are present. Forms + photo set attached; acceptance per VIS-A Β§6.

Co.05

Ceramic Frit

DSS-Co.05.01

Frit Smears / Offset

DSS-Co.05.01
Frit Smears / Offset
(Ceramic frit anomaly β€” directional β€œdrag,” smudge, or registration shift of the fired frit pattern; planar behind the viewing surface; typically SC-0 at the viewing face. Confirm frit face, artwork intent, and location before attribution.)

Classification & Scope (Normative)

Frit smears/offset are appearance changes within a fired ceramic frit pattern (dots/lines/graphics) where the intended edges are dragged, feathered, or shifted relative to the artwork. The anomaly is planar in the frit layer (usually on a non-viewing face such as #2 or #4) and non-tactile from the viewing surface. Classification is appearance-only per VIS (method-agnostic). Inspect after Non-Invasive Reveal at the viewing face under VIS lighting/geometry; record surface numbering and worked-surface status.

System ID is critical. Verify frit location (surface #), pattern specification (dot size/spacing/line weight), vision vs. non-vision zones, and intended artwork tolerances (shop drawings/submittals).

Typical Presentation (Informative)

  • Directional drag/smudge along the screen/roller travel direction; edges look wiped or teardropped.
  • Registration offset: entire dot array or linework appears shifted by a small, consistent vector, producing double-image or uneven margins.
  • Often lot-repetitive: neighboring lites show similar magnitude/direction of smear/offset.

Field Identification Cues (Normative)

Surface-catch class (MSRT)

  • From the viewing (glass) side: SC-0 (planar behind glass).
  • Do not MSRT the frit face in situ. MSRT supports classification only on the viewing surface.

Visual signature

  • Edge feathering/drag or vector offset of dots/lines; no chip-flank sparkle, no grooves/pits on the viewing face.
  • Dot geometry may become elliptical/teardrop in the direction of travel; line thickening on the lead/trailing edge.

Viewing / lighting

  • Evaluate clean & dry at 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal and oblique sweep (~60°–120Β°); use broad specular to read edge crispness, offset vector, and repeatability. Record distances/angles in-frame.

Location / access

  • Record pane ID and surface numbering (#1–#4; laminate-internal). If the frit resides on #2/#3 (IGU interior) or otherwise non-exposed, in-place correction is out of scope β†’ CAT-5 by location (classification remains Co.05.01).

Mechanism cue (context)

  • Screen registration error, glass slip during print/transfer, wet-phase contact or roller kiss, handling disturbance before β€œset”, or cure/transport vibration. Process paperwork may note setup adjustments near production time.

Severity & CAT Mapping (Normative)

Assign CAT by visibility at acceptance geometry and pattern fidelity impact (edge clarity, offset magnitude). Depth values are apparent optical, not substrate relief.

  • CAT-1 (Benign / non-relief): Minor feather/drag legible mainly at oblique/raking; edge blur ≲ 0.1 dot diameter or line gain ≲ 10%; SC-0.
  • CAT-2 (Light): Discernible smear/offset at standard distance in common lighting; offset ≲ 0.25 dot diameter (or line gain 10–25%) over limited area; SC-0.
  • CAT-3 (Moderate): Pane-noticeable smear/offset at standard distance affecting graphic intent over β‰₯0.5% of the visible field; offset ~0.25–0.5 dot diameter or line gain >25%; SC-0.
  • Reclassify when:
  • Loose paint film on viewing face lifts on reveal β†’ R.02.01 Paint overspray.
  • Front-face grooves/pits/chip flanks present β†’ evaluate M/Th families.
  • Opacity density (cloud) shifts without edge geometry β†’ Co.04.01 Mottle/Cloudiness.
  • CAT-5 (by condition/location): Between-pane/inaccessible frit face or system constraints preclude in-place work β†’ CAT-5.

CAT is appearance-based; acceptance is separate under VIS-A at 12/36/72 in. This condition is commonly producer/system-governed when on non-exposed faces.

Differentiation & Mis-ID Pitfalls (Informative)

  • vs. Back-paint mottle (Co.04.01): Mottle is cloud-like density variation; Co.05.01 shows geometric edge drag/offset tied to artwork.
  • vs. AR/low-E anomalies (Co.02/Co.03): Functional films lack ink dot/line geometry and registration cues.
  • vs. Abrasion fields (M.02): Abrasion creates directional micro-texture at the viewing face (often SC-1); Co.05.01 is SC-0 at the viewing face and edge-geometry-specific.

Evidence Package *(Documentation Requirements) (Normative)

  1. Photo set (VIS): 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal + oblique; macro frames of dot/line edges showing drag or offset; overview establishing vector direction and area. Record distance/angle in-frame.
  2. System ID. Confirm frit face (surface #), pattern spec (dot size/spacing/line weight), lot/date; obtain shop drawings/submittals if available.
  3. MSRT (viewing face). Record SC-0 to distinguish from front-face mechanical/chemical attack.
  4. Lot/replication check. Survey adjacent lites for repeatability (supports process origin).
  5. Forms: Pane ID; surface numbering & worked-surface status; reveal status; lighting/time; geometry checklist; photos attached.
  6. Acceptance split: Post-restoration acceptance per VIS-A Β§6; classification β‰  acceptance. Non-exposed frit faces are typically outside in-place scope.

Reporting Language (Template)

  • Co.05.01 Frit Smears / Offset β€” Directional drag/registration shift of ceramic frit on surface #___ (frit face confirmed); MSRT (viewing face): SC-0; visible at [12/36/72 in] under VIS geometry. Morphology: edge feather/offset, no chip-flank grooves/pits at viewing face. Classification: CAT-[1/2/3] by visibility and pattern fidelity; CAT-5 if between-pane/inaccessible. Forms + photo set attached; acceptance per VIS-A Β§6.

DSS-Co.05.02

Pinholes / Voids (Ceramic Frit)

DSS-Co.05.02
Pinholes / Voids (Ceramic Frit)
(Ceramic frit anomaly β€” discrete clear points or micro-voids within the fired frit field; reads through glass from the viewing side; typically SC-0 at the viewing face. Confirm frit face, artwork intent, and location before attribution.)

Classification & Scope (Normative)

Frit pinholes/voids are discrete, point-like clearings or ultra-thin spots occurring within a fired ceramic frit pattern (dots/lines/solid fields). From the viewing face they appear as tiny bright/clear points in transmission or sparkle points in reflection. The defect is planar within the frit layer (commonly on #2 or #4) and non-tactile at the viewing surface. Classification is appearance-only per VIS (method-agnostic). Inspect after Non-Invasive Reveal at the viewing face under VIS lighting/geometry; record surface numbering and worked-surface status.

System ID is critical. Verify frit location (surface #), pattern specification (dot size/spacing/coverage), vision vs. non-vision zones, and intended tolerances (shop drawings/submittals).

Typical Presentation (Informative)

  • Isolated or clustered clear points typically 0.1–2.0 mm diameter, occasionally larger where solvent pop or trapped air discharged.
  • Constellations may align along application direction, screen edges, or contamination trails.
  • Under back-lighting pinholes present as bright windows; under broad specular they sparkle against the frit field.

Field Identification Cues (Normative)

Surface-catch class (MSRT)

  • At the viewing (glass) surface: SC-0 (defect is behind the viewing face in the frit layer).
  • Do not MSRT the frit face in situ. MSRT supports classification only on the viewing face.

Visual signature

  • Sharp-edged clear points inside the frit region; no chip-flank sparkle, no grooves/pits on the viewing surface.
  • Size distribution within a cluster is often narrow; repeatability across lites suggests process origin (screen/ink/wet-film/cure).

Viewing / lighting

  • Evaluate clean & dry at 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal and oblique sweep (~60°–120Β°); capture back-lit frames (ambient interior lighting) and raking macros to verify smooth viewing face. Record distances/angles in-frame.

Location / access

  • Record pane ID and surface numbering (#1–#4; laminate-internal). If the frit is on #2/#3 (IGU interior) or otherwise non-exposed, in-place correction is out of scope β†’ CAT-5 by location (classification remains Co.05.02).

Mechanism cue (context)

  • Particulate contamination on glass or screen, insufficient wet film, air entrapment/solvent pop, screen mesh anomalies, edge draw-down, or local adhesion loss at point seeds post-fire.

Severity & CAT Mapping (Normative)

Assign CAT by visibility at acceptance geometry and count/density within critical sightlines. Depth values are apparent optical, not substrate relief.

  • CAT-1 (Benign / non-relief): Few, very fine pinholes legible mainly at oblique/back-lit; SC-0 viewing face; cumulative affected area negligible.
  • CAT-2 (Light): Scattered pinholes visible at standard distance in common lighting; SC-0; cumulative area ≀0.5% of the frit field.
  • CAT-3 (Moderate): Clusters/bands or repeatable rows visible at standard distance affecting perceived uniformity >0.5% area or along critical sightlines/margins; SC-0.

Reclassify when:

  • Points accompanied by front-face pits/fused nodules β†’ consider Th.01 Hot particle impingement.
  • Loose paint on viewing face lifts on reveal β†’ R.02.01 Paint overspray film (not frit voids).
  • Opacity mottle without discrete points β†’ Co.04.01 Mottle/Cloudiness.
  • CAT-5 (by condition/location): Between-pane/inaccessible frit face or system constraints preclude in-place work β†’ CAT-5.

CAT is appearance-based; acceptance is separate under VIS-A at 12/36/72 in. When on non-exposed faces, frit pinholes are typically producer/system-governed and outside in-place restoration scope.

Differentiation & Mis-ID Pitfalls (Informative)

  • vs. Back-paint pinholes (Co.04.02): Both read as bright points, but system and location differ; confirm ceramic frit vs. organic back-paint and face.
  • vs. Mineral peppering (Ch.03): Mineral systems show ring/run wetting geometry and may yield SC-1/2; Co.05.02 is ringless and SC-0 at the viewing face.
  • vs. Surface abrasion pitting (M/Th): True surface pits exhibit SC-1/2 and micro-crater morphology at the viewing face; frit pinholes remain planar behind glass.
  • vs. AR/low-E pinholes (Co.01.03): Functional low-E/AR pinholes alter interference color on vision coatings; frit pinholes occur within opaque/semi-opaque ceramic artwork.

Evidence Package *(Documentation Requirements) (Normative)

  1. Photo set (VIS): 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal + oblique; back-lit frames to reveal points; macro/raking frames confirming smooth viewing surface.
  2. System ID. Confirm frit face, pattern spec, lot/date; obtain shop drawings/submittals if available.
  3. MSRT (viewing face). Record SC-0.
  4. Lot/replication check. Survey adjacent units for coordinate repetition (supports producer-intrinsic origin).
  5. Forms: Pane ID; surface numbering & worked-surface status; reveal status; lighting/time; geometry checklist; photos attached.
  6. Acceptance split: Post-restoration acceptance per VIS-A Β§6; classification β‰  acceptance.

Reporting Language (Template)

  • Co.05.02 Pinholes / Voids (Ceramic Frit) β€” Discrete clear points within fired frit on surface #___ (frit face confirmed); MSRT (viewing face): SC-0; visible at [12/36/72 in] under VIS geometry (back-lit/specular). Morphology: point voids, no chip-flank grooves/pits at viewing face. Classification: CAT-[1/2/3] by visibility/density; CAT-5 if between-pane/inaccessible. Forms + photo set attached; acceptance per VIS-A Β§6.

DSS-Co.05.03

Frit Over-Spray / Edge Ghost

DSS-Co.05.03
Frit Over-Spray / Edge Ghost

(Ceramic frit anomaly β€” faint halo, fog, or particulate fringe extending beyond the intended frit boundary after application/firing; reads through glass from the viewing side; typically SC-0 at the viewing face. Confirm frit face, mask lines, and artwork intent before attribution.)

Classification & Scope (Normative)

Frit over-spray / edge ghost is an appearance change where fine frit particulates or mist extend just outside the intended frit edge (mask/screen boundary), producing a narrow, edge-parallel halo or ghost fringe after firing. The condition is planar within the fired frit layer (usually on #2 or #4) and non-tactile from the viewing surface. Classification is appearance-only per VIS (method-agnostic). Inspect after Non-Invasive Reveal at the viewing face under VIS lighting/geometry; record surface numbering and worked-surface status.

System ID is critical. Verify frit location (surface #), edge geometry (straight/curved, corner details), mask/artwork specification, and intended edge tolerance from shop drawings/submittals.

Typical Presentation (Informative)

  • Narrow halo band (commonly 1–8 mm) immediately outside the frit edge; density decays with distance from the edge.
  • Uniform along long edges or localized at corners/start-stop zones; may show fine β€œsparkle” under raking from micro-particulate in the halo.
  • Often lot-repetitive along identical edges, indicating process origin (mask leakage/spray plume).

Field Identification Cues (Normative)

Surface-catch class (MSRT)

  • From the viewing (glass) side: SC-0 (planar defect behind the glass).
  • Do not MSRT the frit face in situ. MSRT supports classification only on the viewing surface.

Visual signature

  • Edge-parallel fringe/gradient following the exact frit perimeter; no chip-flank sparkle, no grooves/pits at the viewing face.
  • Gradient profile: highest density at frit boundary, dissipating outward; no ring/run geometry.

Viewing / lighting

  • Evaluate clean & dry at 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal and oblique sweep (~60°–120Β°); use raking macros across the edge transition and broad specular to show halo gradient. Record distances/angles in-frame.

Location / access

  • Record pane ID and surface numbering (#1–#4; laminate-internal). If frit is on #2/#3 (IGU interior) or otherwise non-exposed, in-place correction is out of scope β†’ CAT-5 by location (classification remains Co.05.03).

Mechanism cue (context)

  • Mask leakage, spray plume beyond mask, screen bleed at edge, electrostatic drift, or pre-fire handling shedding near boundary. Consistency along identical edges supports process attribution.

Severity & CAT Mapping (Normative)

Assign CAT by visibility at acceptance geometry and halo prominence/extent. Depth values are apparent optical, not substrate relief.

  • CAT-1 (Benign / non-relief): Very faint halo legible mainly at oblique/raking; halo width ≲ 2–3 mm; SC-0 viewing face.
  • CAT-2 (Light): Discernible fringe at standard distance in common lighting; halo width ~3–6 mm or moderate density along limited lengths; SC-0.
  • CAT-3 (Moderate): Pane-noticeable halo at standard distance along long edges/corners, width ≳ 6–8 mm or high density compromising edge crispness over β‰₯0.5% of visible field; SC-0.

Reclassify when:

  • Cloud-like opacity shifts without edge-parallel geometry β†’ Co.04.01 Mottle/Cloudiness.
  • Loose paint on viewing face lifts on reveal β†’ R.02.01 Paint overspray film.
  • Front-face grooves/pits/fused nodules β†’ consider M/Th families.
  • CAT-5 (by condition/location): Between-pane/inaccessible frit face or system constraints preclude in-place work β†’ CAT-5.

CAT is appearance-based; acceptance is separate under VIS-A Β§6 at 12/36/72 in.

Differentiation & Mis-ID Pitfalls (Informative)

  • vs. Roller pickup (Co.02.01): Roller ghosting shows panel-spanning parallel bands at fixed pitch, not edge-tied halos.
  • vs. Back-paint edge fog (Co.04.01): Similar halo can occur in back-paint; confirm system and face to avoid mis-attribution.
  • vs. Chemical halos (Ch family): Chemistry presents rings/runs/wetting geometry and may yield SC-1/2; Co.05.03 is edge-parallel, ringless, and SC-0 at the viewing face.
  • vs. Frit smears/offset (Co.05.01): Smears/offset impact the artwork edge itself (drag/registration); Co.05.03 is a separate fringe outside the intended boundary.

Evidence Package *(Documentation Requirements) (Normative)

  1. Photo set (VIS): 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal + oblique; raking macros across the edge transition; overview frames showing edge length and uniformity. Record distance/angle in-frame.
  2. System ID. Confirm frit face, mask/artwork specification, lot/date; obtain shop drawings/submittals if available.
  3. MSRT (viewing face). Record SC-0 to distinguish from front-face mechanical/chemical attack.
  4. Lot/replication check. Survey adjacent units/edges for repeatability (supports process origin).
  5. Forms: Pane ID; surface numbering & worked-surface status; reveal status; lighting/time; geometry checklist; photos attached.
  6. Acceptance split: Post-restoration acceptance per VIS-A Β§6; classification β‰  acceptance.

Reporting Language (Template)

  • Co.05.03 Frit Over-Spray / Edge Ghost β€” Edge-parallel halo/fringe beyond frit boundary on surface #___ (frit face confirmed); MSRT (viewing face): SC-0; visible at [12/36/72 in] under VIS geometry (oblique/raking most legible). Morphology: gradient fringe, no chip-flank grooves/pits at viewing face. Classification: CAT-[1/2/3] by visibility/extent; CAT-5 if between-pane/inaccessible. Forms + photo set attached; acceptance per VIS-A Β§6.
Shopping Cart