Hard-Water Staining & Assessment

On this page

RESOURCE CENTER / FIELD ASSESSMENT

Hard-water conditions: deposit, stain, or etch?

Use a clean baseline, controlled reveal, consistent viewing geometry, and surface-relief cues to separate removable mineral material from persistent non-etch staining and actual glass-surface alteration.

THE THREE-CONDITION MODEL

Identify what remains on the surface after a controlled reveal

These definitions align to the existing Ch.03 Hard-Water / Mineral System in the Damage Specification Standards. The DSS identifies the condition; it does not prescribe a restoration method or decide post-restoration acceptance.

Colored-pencil technical illustration of removable mineral deposits on architectural glass
Approved created technical illustration; not a documentary photograph.

CONDITION 1 / SURFACE MATERIAL

Mineral deposits

Bonded mineral residue that sits on the glass. When it is fully removed without altering the substrate, no modeled micro-texture remains and the clean glass reads SC-0.

What you see
Spot constellations, rings, halos, crystalline scale, run trains, or sheet-like films that follow water exposure and drying patterns.
What confirms it
After a Non-Invasive Reveal and a small controlled residue-lift test, the clean substrate has no modeled micro-texture and reads SC-0.
How to address it
Use the sourced reveal and controlled residue-lift process to expose a representative clean area. Do not abrade or force a classification.
DSS Ch.03.01Mineral Deposits (removable)
Colored-pencil technical illustration of persistent non-etch mineral staining on architectural glass
Approved created technical illustration; not a documentary photograph.

CONDITION 2 / PERSISTENT NON-ETCH

Mineral staining

A tenacious film, veil, or color shift that persists after reveal, while a truly clean substrate remains SC-0 with no modeled micro-texture.

What you see
Soft halos, bands, whitish or grey veil, gently mottled tone, or persistent discoloration in prior deposit and runoff footprints.
What confirms it
A revealed test patch still shows an optical appearance change, but the clean glass substrate remains non-relief (SC-0).
How to address it
Document the persistent film and clean test patch. Evaluate within trained restoration scope; a product result alone does not prove stain or etch identity.
DSS Ch.03.02Mineral Staining (persistent film/discoloration, non-etch)
Colored-pencil technical illustration of mineral etching and subsurface micro-texture on architectural glass
Approved created technical illustration; not a documentary photograph.

CONDITION 3 / SURFACE ALTERATION

Mineral etching

Subsurface attack that remains after surface material is removed. The glass shows modeled micro-texture, diminished specular clarity, and typically an SC-1 or SC-2 response.

What you see
Soft-edged frosted fields, milky or dulled reflections, persistent ring and run footprints, and non-directional micro-texture in raking light.
What confirms it
Modeled micro-texture remains on the clean substrate after reveal, commonly with a slight or clear MSRT response (SC-1 or SC-2).
How to address it
Cleaning alone cannot reverse altered glass. Complete DSS/CAT assessment, confirm coating and integrity limits, and refer for trained restoration evaluation.
DSS Ch.03.03Mineral Etching (subsurface micro-texture)

DESCRIPTIVE ASSESSMENT AID

GlassRenu Hard-Water Condition Spectrum

The spectrum adds useful field detail without replacing DSS identity, VIS CAT classification, or acceptance criteria.

  1. H0Clear baselineClean, dry surface with no visible mineral footprint.
  2. D1Light spotsDiscrete spots or ring halos; removable surface material.
  3. D2Bonded scaleDense or crystalline deposit field that still clears to SC-0.
  4. S1Faint veilPersistent close-view halo or film; clean substrate remains SC-0.
  5. S2Persistent stainBroader visible film, banding, or discoloration; still non-etch.
  6. E1Slight micro-textureSubtle modeled texture with an SC-1 response after reveal.
  7. E2Clear micro-textureLegible frosted field or optical loss with an SC-2 response.

Do not convert these labels directly into CAT numbers. Use each DSS Severity & CAT Mapping section with the complete VIS assessment.

FIELD SEQUENCE

A repeatable assessment from location to classification

  1. 1

    Confirm the surface

    Record pane ID, product family, exposed surface number, worked-surface status, and whether a functional coating may be present. Use parallax to separate exposed from between-pane conditions.

  2. 2

    Document before cleaning

    Capture the overall water pattern, edges, sill and mullion relationships, and any suspected exposure source. Treat unknown residue or chemicals as hazardous until identified.

  3. 3

    Establish a clean baseline

    Perform the sourced Non-Invasive Reveal using neutral-pH/distilled water and lint-free microfiber. Use a small representative test area; do not abrade to force removal.

  4. 4

    Inspect clean and dry

    View at 12, 36, and 72 inches at normal incidence and through an oblique sweep. Use raking light to resolve film boundaries, modeled micro-texture, and optical scatter.

  5. 5

    Check substrate relief safely

    When appropriate, make one light, non-marring MSRT pass on a representative clean area. Use a polymer stylus if a coating is suspected. Never stylus across crystalline nodules or contaminated material.

  6. 6

    Assign and document the DSS

    Use Ch.03.01 for removable deposit, Ch.03.02 for persistent non-etch staining, and Ch.03.03 for etched micro-texture. Record multiple codes when conditions overlap.

FAST DIFFERENTIATION

What does the revealed test patch show?

Material clears

Deposit

Clean substrate is SC-0 with no residual modeled micro-texture or persistent optical shadow.

Appearance remains

Stain

A film, veil, or color shift persists, but the clean substrate remains SC-0 and non-etched.

Texture remains

Etch

Modeled micro-texture, frost, or optical scatter remains on the clean glass, commonly at SC-1 or SC-2.

Source basis and version

This page is a navigational and assessment aid derived from the GlassRenu Damage Specification Standards 2026 master source: Ch.03.01 Mineral Deposits, Ch.03.02 Mineral Staining, and Ch.03.03 Mineral Etching, together with the VIS inspection geometry and MSRT conventions cited by those records.

Module version: 0.2.1   Assessment guide: 1.0   Date: October 21, 2026

Shopping Cart