On this page
- Diagnosis summary
- Safety and classification scope
- Classification & Scope (Normative)
- Typical Presentation (Informative)
- Field Identification Cues (Normative)
- Surface-catch class (MSRT)
- Visual signature
- Viewing / lighting
- Location / access
- Mechanism cue (context)
- Severity & CAT Mapping (Normative)
- Differentiation & Mis-ID Pitfalls (Informative)
- Evidence Package *(Documentation Requirements) (Normative)
- Reporting Language (Template)
- Related glossary terms
- Related DSS
- Source and version
DAMAGE SPECIFICATION STANDARD / METHOD-AGNOSTIC
DSS-V.02.01 — Acid-Marker Tagging (HF-Bearing)
Intentional chemical etch - field-applied acids/fluoride gels; whitened modeled micro-texture with run legs/cream swirls/meniscus rings; typically SC-2 in worked strokes, SC-1 at feather; depth depends on chemistry, dwell, and reapplication
Diagnosis summary
Acid-marker tagging is an appearance change produced by field-applied acidic agents (often HF-bearing gels/creams or “etch pens”) that chemically attack silica, creating whitened, matte micro-texture in letter/stroke geometry. Presentations include freehand tags, initials, and panel-fill scribbles; artifacts such as cream swirls, meniscus rims, runs/drips are common.

Classification & Scope (Normative)
NormativeAcid-marker tagging is an appearance change produced by field-applied acidic agents (often HF-bearing gels/creams or “etch pens”) that chemically attack silica, creating whitened, matte micro-texture in letter/stroke geometry. Presentations include freehand tags, initials, and panel-fill scribbles; artifacts such as cream swirls, meniscus rims, runs/drips are common. Classification is appearance-only per VIS (method-agnostic). Inspect after Non-Invasive Reveal under VIS lighting/geometry; record surface numbering and worked-surface status.
Typical Presentation (Informative)
Informative- Chalk-white to pale grey etched strokes forming alphanumerics or symbols; soft edges compared to scribed grooves.
- Process artifacts: cream swirl patterning, brush/dauber texture, meniscus rings, and vertical run legs from over-application.
- Halo beyond strokes where thin film partially etched.
Field Identification Cues (Normative)
NormativeSurface-catch class (MSRT)
- SC-2 across worked strokes (distinct interruption from etched micro-texture).
- SC-1 in feathered halos/thin film zones; SC-0 outside the affected area.
- Perform one light, non-marring pass on a small revealed test patch (substrate). Use a polymer stylus if a functional coating is suspected. MSRT supports classification only; do not abrade to “prove” relief.
Visual signature
- Modeled, non-directional micro-texture (no chip-flank sparkle) with white/opaque appearance; swirl/cream tool marks within fills; runs with faint etched tails.
- No fused nodules (not hot particle); no continuous granular field (not abrasive blast); not a sharp incised groove (not scribed).
Viewing / lighting
- Evaluate clean & dry at 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal and oblique sweep (~60°-120°); use low-angle raking to show meniscus rims, run legs, and modeled texture. Record distances/angles in-frame.
Location / access
- Record pane ID and surface numbering (#1-#4; laminate-internal). Typically on public-facing exposed faces (#1 or #4). Between-pane evidence by parallax on #2/#3 → CAT-5 by location.
Mechanism cue (context)
- Graffiti prevalence, tag clusters mixing paint and acid, ghost repeats at transit nodes; possible glove/cream residue on adjacent frames.
Severity & CAT Mapping (Normative)
NormativeAssign CAT by visibility at acceptance geometry and MSRT after a reveal patch. Depth values are indicative-field measurement not required.
- CAT-2 (Light): Thin, feathered acid film forming pale stroke ghosts; SC-1-SC-2 intermittently; minimal standard-view impact. Indicative relief: ~10-40 μm.
- CAT-3 (Moderate): Clearly legible etched strokes visible at standard distance, SC-2 consistent; meniscus rings/runs evident. Indicative relief: ~40-120 μm.
- CAT-4 (Severe): Bold, over-worked fills or re-etched layers producing strong whitening legible at standard and wide-field; SC-2 throughout, possible local undercut/roughness. Indicative relief: ~120-300+ μm local maxima dependent on exposure/dwell.
- Reclassify when: If strokes are incised with chip-flank sparkle → V.01.02 scribed/engraved; if field is uniform granular matte with mask-sharp edges → V.01.01 abrasive-blast; if residue is amber/oily without etch → R.04 family.
- CAT-5 (by condition/location): Between-pane/inaccessible by parallax, integrity indicators, or confirmed functional-coating loss on the surface to be worked → CAT-5.
CAT is appearance-based; acceptance is separate under VIS-A at 12/36/72 in. Do not abrade to “force” a response during classification.
Differentiation & Mis-ID Pitfalls (Informative)
Informative- vs. Scribed grooves (V.01.02): Scribing shows sharp grooves with chip flanks and directional incision; acid-tags show whitened modeled texture, swirls, runs, and soft stroke edges.
- vs. Abrasive-blast (V.01.01): Blast fields are uniform within masks and granular; acid-tags show application artifacts (cream swirls/runs) and variable whiteness.
- vs. Mineral etch (Ch.03.03): Mineral etch forms halo rings and non-graphic fields tied to wetting; acid-tags form intentional stroke geometry with tool/cream patterns.
- vs. Coating anomalies (Co-family): Coating issues are planar on designated faces and lack runs/cream swirls; acid-tags are localized graphic events.
Evidence Package *(Documentation Requirements) (Normative)
Normative- Photo set (VIS): 12 / 36 / 72 in, normal + oblique; raking macros of meniscus rims, swirl/brush patterns, run legs; overview of entire tag and context of public interface. Record distance/angle in-frame.
- MSRT result (substrate): After a small reveal test patch, perform one light, non-marring pass through stroke body and halo; record SC-class (SC-2 body, SC-1 halo, SC-0 control).
- Forms: Pane ID; product family & surface numbering; worked surface Y/N; functional coating present on worked surface? (Y/N/Unknown); reveal status; lighting/time; geometry checklist; photos attached.
- Acceptance split: Post-restoration acceptance per VIS-A §6; classification ≠ acceptance. Coated-face appearance rules apply per VIS §6.2.e when the worked surface is a factory functional coating.
Reporting Language (Template)
Template- V.02.01 Acid-Marker Tagging (HF-Bearing) - Whitened, modeled micro-texture with cream swirls/meniscus/runs forming [letters/symbol] on surface #___; post-reveal test patch shows SC-2 in stroke body / SC-1 in halo; visible at [12/36/72 in] under VIS geometry. Morphology: acid-etched strokes, application artifacts, no chip-flank sparkle. Classification: CAT-[2/3/4] by visibility and SC-class; reclassify per notes if scribed/blast/mineral criteria dominate; CAT-5 if between-pane or coating-side loss on the surface to be worked. Forms + photo set attached; acceptance per VIS-A §6.
Related glossary terms
- Test patchGRK-144
- AbrasiveGRK-168
Source and version
GlassRenu Damage Specification Sheets (DSS), DSS-V.02.01. Source revision and extraction date are recorded in the deployment manifest.
Open the complete published DSS with table of contents (PDF)
Normative and informative labels are preserved from the source. The downloadable one-sheet is a condensed classification aid; this web page retains the complete source-based specification content.